1.         2. www.toryburchoutlethot.com
was then,cefrth t gvern withut theni..,.'!' i <:!. . ' i. i i , (1 . ;:',If prfs wiere wanting f Mr. Rfse having written the bservatins with a strng bias upn his mind, and f his understanding being pwerfully perated upn by that atmsphere f party, in which he had s lng lived, hi& remarks upn Mr. Fx's treatment f Dalrymple wuld amply supply the defect He says, "Thse, wh wish "t. be mre fully and particularly infrmed n the 5 'whle f the intercurse between the English and "French Curts, during the reign; f Charles; II, 4t and James IIv will nt be disappinted in referring 'i ty Dalrympie's Memirs: fr althugh there may be "grund fr differing with that authr, n his reasning, "there is n appearance f his having had any reluctance M the discvery f factfs, r't the rdiducrfn 'f ' dcuments, by which tliey migHt be ascertained.. "It is Difficult therefre t understand n what fun SB(TMN' datjn Mr. Fx has stated that Tory Burch Outlet it was in cnsequence "f his dissatisfactin at the manner, in which Mr. ' JMacphersn, and' Sir Jhn Dalrymple had explained, "i sand cnducted their respective publicatins, that he ; was induced t cnsult their respective dcuments, and added, 'that the crrespndence f Barilln did nt "disappint 'his expectatins: as he thught the adt' 'ditindl infrmatin cntained in thse parts f it, "which Sir Jhn Dalrymple had mitted t extract, r '";t publish, s imprtant that :he .prcured cpies f ,'. , "them all,' bserving t ne f his crrespndents, " 'my studies at ;Paris have been 'Useful, beynd what ''' I can describe.'"In the beginning Tory Burch Outlet f this paragraph, Mr. Rse recmmends the Memirs f Sir Jhn Dalrymple, as cntaining full infrmatin upn the whle intercurse between the tw Curts, with the manifest intentin f diminishing the 'merit f Mr. Fx, wh had expressed his dissatisfactin with the bk, and had exercised his industry t supply deficiencies, which as Mr. Rse cntends d nt exist. He gives a reasn fr this recmmendatin, which a strict lgician might deny t be relevant t the matter in dispute, fr, thugh Dalrymple might have nreluctance t the discvery f facts, r the prductin f dcuments, it des nt fllw, that Mr. Fx might nt have discvered sme facts, r prduced smedcuments, which had escaped the ntice f Dalrymple; and it is nt surprising, that Mr. Fx shuld be displeased with the manner, in which he explained, and cnducted his wrk, if, as Mr. Rse allws, there may be grund fr difference with that authr, as t his reasning upn thse facts. This may be added t the lng list f instances, already nticed, in which Mr. Rse first declares he differs frm Mr. Fx, and then prves that he is right, and cncludes at last with adpting his pinin.Mr. Rse having thus answered himself, we might drpthe subject,